Processing math: 100%

Table of Contents

TechPaper #2011004: Diffusion in heterogeneous precipitation

Compatibility

MatCalc version: 5.42 - …
Author: E. Kozeschnik
Created: 2011-06-29
Revisions:

Objectives

In this paper, the implementation of diffusion during heterogenous precipitation in the MatCalc precipitation kinetics framework is discussed.

Main document

Diffusion in the undisturbed crystal

The MatCalc multi-component diffusion model is based on the treatment developed at KTH Stockholm for the DICTRA software. Accordingly, the diffusional mobility Mi of component i and the tracer diffusion coefficient Di are related by the equation

Di=RTMi

with R being the Universal Gas Constant and T being temperature. The values of Mi and Di are accessible through the MatCalc variables MOphasenameelement and DTphasenameelement in the 'diffusion' category of the variables list.

In the MatCalc mobility databases, only the value of Mi is stored, since the thermodynamic factor can be calculated from the thermodynamic information and Di is then uniquely given as a function of composition and temperature only.

Note: The diffusion coefficient used in the precipitation kinetics framework is the tracer diffusivity given above. In the microstructure simulation framework for long-range diffusion, the chemical diffusivity is used in the form of a diffusion matrix, which accounts for all the non-diagonal cross-terms also. In the precipitation kinetics framework, the cross-terms come into play directly in the evolution equations described in the corresponding publication1).

If you want to investigate the influence of the alloy chemistry on the diffusion coefficient, use the chemical diffusion coefficient Dci, which is defined as

Dci=RTMiϕ

with ϕ being the thermodynamic factor. The corresponding MatCalc variable is denoted Dphasenameelement. This version of diffusion coefficient is not used in the precipitation kinetics framework, since the MatCalc evolution equations for precipitation are based on the explicit us of chemical potentials, which takes the effect of alloy composition into account directly.

Diffusion along dislocations

Dislocations are linear lattice defects, which provide a network of linear high-speed diffusion paths. In the core of a dislocation, the lattice is expanded, thus supporting the possibility for solute atoms to move considerably faster than in the undisturbed bulk crystal.

Note: The mobilities saved in the database are assessed for equilibrium conditions, which means that some given mean grain size and a dislocation density (most likely) close to its equilibrium value have been present during the experiment. The diffusivities of the database do not represent values for defect-free single crystals, but poly-crystalline microstructures.

The diffusion carried along by dislocations can be taken into account rigorously in the diffusivities used in the precipitation kinetics simulations by simply estimating the ratio between undisturbed crystal volume and the volume consumed by the dislocation cores. In MatCalc, the following relation is used to define a diffusion correction factor for pipe diffusion along dislocations

Di=DiαPD,

with Di being the effective diffusion coefficient of component i. The correction factor αPD is given as

αPD=DiDi=1Di(πR2coreρDdi+(1πR2coreρ)Di).

where Ddi is the diffusivity in the dislocation core.

The value of αPD is accessible through the MatCalc variable PIPE_DCFprecdomainelement in the 'kinetics: prec_domain special' category.

In the above equations, a key parameter for evaluation of the effective diffusivity Di is the diffusivity of element i in the dislocation core Ddi. In MatCalc, the dislocation core diffusivity is coupled to the bulk diffusivity via a factor αdi, which reads

Ddi=αdiDi

αdi can be defined as a user-function in the 'subst. disl. diffusion as ratio from matrix' and 'interst. disl. diffusion as ratio from matrix' fields of the 'special' tab of the 'precipitation domain' dialog. Note that you can set the ratios separately for substitutional and interstitial elements.

Note: The values for αdi that are evaluated with the above equation are used in all MatCalc expressions, where the tracer diffusion The following values are recommended for different alloy systems:

system Temperature [K] αdi MatCalc syntax source
Al (fcc) 298 - 933 1.07101exp(43900RT) 1.07e3*exp(43900/(R*T)) unpublished research
Fe (fcc) 298 - 1811 6.43101exp(118700RT) 6.43e-1*exp(118700/(R*T))
Fe (bcc) 298 - 693 3.33101exp(70000RT) 3.33e1*exp(70000/(R*T))
Fe (bcc) 693 - 1214 1.33102exp(115000RT) 1.33e-2*exp(115000/(R*T))
Fe (bcc) 1214 - 1811 1.00102exp(25000RT) 1.00e2*exp(25000/(R*T))
Ni (fcc) 298 - 1728 1.74101exp(116100RT) 1.74e-1*exp(116100/(R*T))

coefficient Di enters. The pipe diffusion correction factor thus represents a prefactor to the diffusivity value that is calculated from the mobility database.

In general, the value of αdi1 for typical dislocation densities of well-annealed metallic materials, i.e. 1011m/m3 for fcc metals and 1012m/m3 for bcc metals. However, in the case of dislocation densities exceeding approximately 1013 or 1014m/m3, the influence of αdi becomes significant. At dislocation densities of 1015 or 1016m/m3, which are typical for martensitic microstructures, the pipe diffusion correction factor adopts values of several orders of magnitude.

Important note …

For predictive simulations in deformed metals and/or martensitic or bainitic microstructures, it is absolutely necessary to account for the influence of pipe diffusion! This effect often accelerates the precipitation kinetics by several orders of magnitude.

Diffusion along grain boundaries

In MatCalc, grain boundaries are assumed to be high-angle boundaries, which provide a network of two-dimensional high-speed diffusion paths. In contrast to the pipe diffusion effect, the influence of grain boundary diffusion is not explicitely taken into account as a prefactor to the tracer diffusion coefficient. Instead, the influence of grain boundary diffusion on the overall precipitation kinetics must be included manually. See the corresponding section below.

The grain boundary diffusion coefficient is, however, used in the kinetic framework for grain boundary precipitation2). The grain boundary diffusivity is explicitely integrated in the evolution equations and must be correctly set, if this type of precipitation geometry is used. For the correct definition of grain boundary nucleation and growth see also the technical paper on Heterogenous nucleation.

In the treatment of grain boundary precipitation, the grain boundary diffusivity Dgi is a key parameter. In MatCalc, the grain boundary diffusivity is coupled to the bulk diffusivity via a factor αgi, which reads

Dgi=αgiDi

αgi can be defined as a user-function in the 'subst. gb diffusion as ratio from matrix' and 'interst. gb diffusion as ratio from matrix' fields of the 'special' tab of the 'precipitation domain' dialog. Note that you can set the ratios separately for substitutional and interstitial elements.

The following values are recommended for different alloy systems:

system Temperature [K] αgi MatCalc syntax source
Al (fcc) 298 - 933 1.36100exp(67000RT) 1.36*exp(67000/(R*T)) unpublished research
Fe (fcc) 298 - 1811 7.86101exp(141400RT) 7.86e-1*exp(141400/(R*T))
Fe (bcc) 298 - 693 6.33101exp(87700RT) 6.33e1*exp(87700/(R*T))
Fe (bcc) 693 - 1214 2.53102exp(132700RT) 2.53e-2*exp(132700/(R*T))
Fe (bcc) 1214 - 1811 1.90102exp(42700RT) 1.90e2*exp(42700/(R*T))
Ni (fcc) 298 - 1728 5.22103exp(184700RT) 5.22e-3*exp(184700/(R*T))

Tuning diffusivities for special cases

In some cases of precipitation kinetics simulations, the diffusion coefficient stored in the mobility database needs some adjustment, since the actual microstructure of the system does not represent the conditions for which the diffusivity has been experimentally assessed. For these situations, the so-called 'matrix diffusion enhancement factor' (MDEF) can be utilized to 'tune' the diffusion coefficients used in the simiulations toi values that better represent the experimental conditions.

The MDEF is accessible through the 'substitutional matrix diffusion enhancement' and the 'interstitial matrix diffusion enhancement' in the 'special' tab of the 'precipitation domains' dialog.

In most practical situations, it will not be necessary to modify the MDEF value. Sometimes, this parameter value is set between 0.2 to 5, in order to achieve 'perfekt' agreement between simulation and experiment.

Note: In the viewpoint of a general simulation strategy, it is not recommended , however, to change this value away from the default value of 1.0, since any change of these parameters does impair the predictive capabilities of your simulations.

In some cases, however, a modification of the experimental diffusivities can be justified. One example, for instance, is precipitation at martensite subgrain boundaries. It is well known that diffusion along the subgrain boundary network is significantly faster than diffusion in the bulk crystal. For this type of precipitate, an MDEF of 5 has shown to be a reasonable diffusion enhancement, which seems to reproduce the real diffusion conditions reasonably well. For any other 'artifical' modification of the diffusion coefficients make sure that you can justify it on physical grounds.

The following values are recommended for selected cases:

case MDEF comment
Typical precipitation simulation 1.0 default value is recommended
Grain boundary precpitation 1.0 Fast GB diffusion is accounted for in the gb precipitation model and the gb diffusion coefficient Dgi.
Grain boundary edges and corners 1.0 - 3.0 Fast gb diffusion not accounted for in the model. Slight acceleration plausible
Subgrain boundaries 1.0 - 5.0 Fast sgb diffusion not accounted for in the model. Slight acceleration plausible

Note: In addition to the acceleration of diffusion along grain boundaries and subgrain boundaries, significantly higher diffusion knietics can also be stimulated by the presence of quenched-in or deformation-induced excess vacancies. See the corresponding article Excess vacancies for a description of this effect and how to take it into account in your simulations.

1)
J. Svoboda, F. D. Fischer, P. Fratzl and E. Kozeschnik, „Modelling of kinetics in multi-component multi-phase systems with spherical precipitates I. – Theory“, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2004, 385 (1-2) 166-174.
2)
E. Kozeschnik, J. Svoboda, R. Radis and F.D. Fischer, “Mean-field model for the growth and coarsening of stoichiometric precipitates at grain boundaries”, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18 (2010) 015011 (19pp).